<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter has Email Equivalents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://orangejack.com/twitter-has-email-equivalents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://orangejack.com/twitter-has-email-equivalents/</link>
	<description>helping you use the web well</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:57:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: My followers on Twitter: Ignore, block, or #unfollowfriday? &#124; rob's place</title>
		<link>http://orangejack.com/twitter-has-email-equivalents/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>My followers on Twitter: Ignore, block, or #unfollowfriday? &#124; rob's place</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 11:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejack.com/?p=233#comment-267</guid>
		<description>[...] can be used for one-way and multi-way communication/conversation.  You can talk publicly to everyone  or privately to someone.  Some of the rules for how you can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can be used for one-way and multi-way communication/conversation.  You can talk publicly to everyone  or privately to someone.  Some of the rules for how you can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://orangejack.com/twitter-has-email-equivalents/comment-page-1/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejack.com/?p=233#comment-253</guid>
		<description>@Dana- your boycott post is right on. There is too much noise on every website (just do a search for anything and you&#039;ll find noise).  It is indeed up to us to add value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dana- your boycott post is right on. There is too much noise on every website (just do a search for anything and you&#8217;ll find noise).  It is indeed up to us to add value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: For People Who Don&#8217;t &#8216;Get&#8217; Twitter (or any other media) &#124; rob's place</title>
		<link>http://orangejack.com/twitter-has-email-equivalents/comment-page-1/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>For People Who Don&#8217;t &#8216;Get&#8217; Twitter (or any other media) &#124; rob's place</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejack.com/?p=233#comment-252</guid>
		<description>[...] an email today that was in response to my post yesterday on my business blog about how Twitter is like Email. The person said:  i still don&#8217;t &#8220;GET&#8221; twitter.  i think i understand it, but i [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an email today that was in response to my post yesterday on my business blog about how Twitter is like Email. The person said:  i still don&#8217;t &#8220;GET&#8221; twitter.  i think i understand it, but i [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana Lookadoo</title>
		<link>http://orangejack.com/twitter-has-email-equivalents/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana Lookadoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejack.com/?p=233#comment-251</guid>
		<description>Rob, I like the &quot;Share something&quot; approach. 

I wrote a post about use of social media and status updates, &quot;“What are you doing?” Boycott&quot;
http://pixelposition.com/boycott/

Often, people who are new to social media answer the question posed by Facebook and Twitter, which turns into a lot of social media noise, IMHO. Facebook&#039;s change a few days ago to &quot;What&#039;s on your mind?&quot; is a slight improvement.

Bottom line is that social media will become valuable as more people share value, creating a higher signal-to-noise ratio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, I like the &#8220;Share something&#8221; approach. </p>
<p>I wrote a post about use of social media and status updates, &#8220;“What are you doing?” Boycott&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://pixelposition.com/boycott/" rel="nofollow">http://pixelposition.com/boycott/</a></p>
<p>Often, people who are new to social media answer the question posed by Facebook and Twitter, which turns into a lot of social media noise, IMHO. Facebook&#8217;s change a few days ago to &#8220;What&#8217;s on your mind?&#8221; is a slight improvement.</p>
<p>Bottom line is that social media will become valuable as more people share value, creating a higher signal-to-noise ratio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Hilton</title>
		<link>http://orangejack.com/twitter-has-email-equivalents/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Hilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejack.com/?p=233#comment-250</guid>
		<description>@kevin Another great analogy. Although as the head of an email marketing department, any subject line over 40 characters makes me shudder ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kevin Another great analogy. Although as the head of an email marketing department, any subject line over 40 characters makes me shudder <img src='http://orangejack.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://orangejack.com/twitter-has-email-equivalents/comment-page-1/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejack.com/?p=233#comment-249</guid>
		<description>@Geno - it&#039;s like when blogs came out people said &quot;I don&#039;t want to read about what you did today&quot;. Now most realize a blog can be used for any communication. Twitter is no different. And you&#039;re absolutely right - there is no &quot;magic app&quot;. They all do their own thing for particular purposes.

@Jim - when I started my first blog, I put at the bottom of each post &quot;comment publicly&quot; and &quot;comment privately&quot;. The public one opened the comment box. The private one opened an email form. But once people learned the difference, I dropped it. The principles are all the same, it&#039;s just each technology calls it something different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Geno &#8211; it&#8217;s like when blogs came out people said &#8220;I don&#8217;t want to read about what you did today&#8221;. Now most realize a blog can be used for any communication. Twitter is no different. And you&#8217;re absolutely right &#8211; there is no &#8220;magic app&#8221;. They all do their own thing for particular purposes.</p>
<p>@Jim &#8211; when I started my first blog, I put at the bottom of each post &#8220;comment publicly&#8221; and &#8220;comment privately&#8221;. The public one opened the comment box. The private one opened an email form. But once people learned the difference, I dropped it. The principles are all the same, it&#8217;s just each technology calls it something different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Tobin at Ignite Social Media</title>
		<link>http://orangejack.com/twitter-has-email-equivalents/comment-page-1/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Tobin at Ignite Social Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejack.com/?p=233#comment-248</guid>
		<description>Rob,

Good analogy. I find a lot of newbies get thrown by the @ and D functions, sort of like they get thrown by the wall versus the inbox (and which is private) in Facebook.

~Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob,</p>
<p>Good analogy. I find a lot of newbies get thrown by the @ and D functions, sort of like they get thrown by the wall versus the inbox (and which is private) in Facebook.</p>
<p>~Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geno</title>
		<link>http://orangejack.com/twitter-has-email-equivalents/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>geno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejack.com/?p=233#comment-247</guid>
		<description>rob, your points are right on.

I know quite a few people who tell me their over it(twitter). Twitter is not a magic app. Your point that like any other communication technology, it isn&#039;t all that new, It&#039;s the &quot;how,&quot; we use it. People have to invest, and get into the action not just snipe.

But on the other hand if sniping is what you want to do, well… snipe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rob, your points are right on.</p>
<p>I know quite a few people who tell me their over it(twitter). Twitter is not a magic app. Your point that like any other communication technology, it isn&#8217;t all that new, It&#8217;s the &#8220;how,&#8221; we use it. People have to invest, and get into the action not just snipe.</p>
<p>But on the other hand if sniping is what you want to do, well… snipe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://orangejack.com/twitter-has-email-equivalents/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejack.com/?p=233#comment-245</guid>
		<description>@Kevin - I thought about it as a subject line, but then decided to go this route instead so that I could put the #tag and RT in the subject line. Either way makes sense. The point is that the concepts of Twitter, just like any other communication technologies, isn&#039;t all that new. We already know &#039;what&#039; to do, just each tech brings a new &#039;how&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kevin &#8211; I thought about it as a subject line, but then decided to go this route instead so that I could put the #tag and RT in the subject line. Either way makes sense. The point is that the concepts of Twitter, just like any other communication technologies, isn&#8217;t all that new. We already know &#8216;what&#8217; to do, just each tech brings a new &#8216;how&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Donahue</title>
		<link>http://orangejack.com/twitter-has-email-equivalents/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Donahue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejack.com/?p=233#comment-244</guid>
		<description>Great analogy. I&#039;ll take it one further... twitter is like an email to the world where you only type the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great analogy. I&#8217;ll take it one further&#8230; twitter is like an email to the world where you only type the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
